« $7.7 Million Snowball | Main | Blogs a good tool for open local government »

The Liquor License

The liquor license as in the only one.  Fellow Council Member Mike Bartley has asked that we accept applications for the on sale liquor license that is "on the shelf".  For over two years we have kept that license hoping to use it to lure a hotel and or fine dining restaurant.  Over the past few months two businesses have sent applications to us hoping we would grant the license to them. 

Although Brookings and several other cities are working hard to get the State to give us more licenses for restaurants I'm not optimistic we will get any more to award this coming year.  Liquor license are as political as it gets and the liquor industry (both the supplies and sellers) have a strong hold on our law makers. 

I think we need to use this license as an attraction tool versus awarding it to a business that is already in town.  Citizen want more dining selections and places to hold meetings, weddings, and the like.  Holding this for someone who comes to us and says it is part of the deal to start up in Brookings would be prudent.   The only upside to opening it up is it may expedite someone coming forward with a new business idea knowing that it may be a year or two before we can award another.

Posted on Wednesday, December 5, 2007 at 09:25PM by Registered CommenterTim Reed in | Comments4 Comments

Reader Comments (4)

Isn't holding it as an incentive for a future deal actually penalizing the existing businesses that have already made the commitment to operate in Brookings? Kind of like saying, 'you're already here, so we're not that interested in you anymore.'
December 6, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJacob
Wasn't giving Lowes an incentive to come to Brookings actually penalizing the existing business that have already made the commitment to operate in Brookings.....

Incentives in cases like this are never fair. What would be fair is any restaurant can serve liquor if the owners are of good character and the location is suitable, but the state feels the need to limit them.

December 6, 2007 | Registered CommenterTim Reed
I suppose that holding it as an attraction tool for some presumably unknown deal could pay off. On the other hand, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, so to speak. Rewarding a worthy existing business could be good for that business and the community. It would also provide an opportunity to make the argument to the state that the license limitations have a large impact on our community's ability to recruit new amenities.
December 7, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJacob
Jacob - I appreciate you acknowleding that there are two sides to this issue and you favor favor awarding it to someone who has already invested in this fine city. I too see your point and will consider it as we move forward with the process.

Hopefully I'm wrong about the state increasing the liceneses and we can give them to all who qualify.
December 8, 2007 | Registered CommenterTim Reed

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.